| CURRENT
ISSUE :: DECEMBER 2003 :: INTERNATIONAL
Was 9/11 a U.S. Plot?
No, but Such Wild Theories Gain Surprising Attention in Europe
By Ian Johnson
Staff Reporter of The Wall Street Journal
How’s this for a theory? A German named Andreas von Bulow
argues in a new book that the U.S. government staged the Sept.
11, 2001, attacks on New York and Washington to justify wars in
Afghanistan and Iraq. It is a tentative theory, Mr. von Bulow admits,
based mostly on his doubt that Osama bin Laden’s al Qaeda
terrorist group launched the attacks.
Is Mr. von Bulow some kind of crackpot? A conspiracy theorist
who believes that Elvis lives and the CIA murdered Kennedy?
Not exactly.
Actually, he is a former German government official whose book,
a bestseller
in Germany, comes from one of the country’s
most prestigious publishing houses and who lectures at well-known
public institutions. And he’s not alone: In recent months,
Germany’s leading broadcaster, ARD, ran a purported documentary
making similar claims, while several other German authors have
published like-minded books.
“If we are being asked to participate in a new world war
that’s going to last years, then I expect that the cause
of [the Sept. 11 attacks] be explained in the minutest detail,” Mr.
von Bulow told a crowd of 500 at Literaturhaus in Munich, a popular
meeting place for the local literary community. “What we
have received is a joke. I’ve just put together the things
that don’t match up.”
Sinking Credibility
Conspiracy theories have long been part of the discourse in some
parts of the globe, especially in places where a muzzled press
and political repression warp public debate. But over the past
two years, improbable theories about the Sept. 11 attacks have
attracted serious attention in some Western countries, often in
direct proportion to the sinking credibility given to the U.S.
and its motives in international affairs.
In Britain, cabinet minister Michael Meacher, who resigned in
the fall, published a blistering attack in the Guardian newspaper,
implying that the U.S. government was involved in the attacks to
justify a more-interventionist foreign policy. In France, Italy
and Spain, authors have hit the bestseller charts over the past
year by claiming that the U.S. is hiding the truth about 9/11.
In most European
countries, conspiracy theories have remained the domain of a
fringe minority.
In Germany, however, the theories
have had legs, and over the past few months, waves of improbable
and outrageous assertions have received serious hearings. A recent
opinion poll by one of Germany’s leading polling organizations
found that one in five Germans believes “the U.S. government
ordered the attacks itself.”
The credibility
given these theories has become so pronounced that the country’s leading newsmagazine, Der Spiegel, ran
a cover story recently, giving a point-by-point rebuttal to the
most widely spread myths. Among them: that Jewish people stayed
out of the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001, because they had
been tipped off. ARD had to backtrack on its purported documentary,
later identifying the program’s producer as a proponent of
conspiracy theories whose ideas weren’t accepted by experts.
A leading newspaper
in Munich published a lengthy piece recently called “Fools of Fear,” ridiculing the ideas. Conspiracy
theories are “having so much success,” says Hans Leyendecker,
who wrote the piece. “We had to do something to counteract
it.”
Germans have
long been among the most pro-American societies in continental
Europe.
But over the past year, German opinion has
turned, opinion polls show. The war in Iraq was a turning point.
Right after the Sept. 11 attacks, Germany pledged “unlimited
solidarity” with the U.S. and sent troops to help out in
Afghanistan. But when sights turned to Iraq, Germans had second
thoughts.
“Somewhere between Kabul and Baghdad, we lost each other,” says
Ron Asmus, a senior fellow of the German Marshall Fund, a foreign-policy
group. “We didn’t just disagree on the policy but on
the facts of what happened, and from that there was a jump to the
conspiracy theories.”
‘Could
Haves’
Few people
have profited more from this changing view than Mr. von Bulow,
a longtime legislator
who left the German government
in the 1990s and began writing on such issues as the role of intelligence
in the Cold War. After Sept. 11, he had doubts, he says, about
the source of the attacks. “Muslims wouldn’t do this
because they would know that it would hurt the Muslim world,” he
says.
For a year,
he says, he gathered information, mostly from Internet sites.
His book
contains many of the same ideas found in a bestseller
from France last year called “The Big Lie.” This summer,
just as German outrage over the war in Iraq was starting to boil,
Mr. von Bulow came out with his book, “The CIA and the 11th
of September, International Terror and the Role of the Secret Services.”
Mr. von Bulow
is careful to phrase his ideas in the subjunctive. “Could
haves” and “might haves” are sprinkled liberally
throughout his book. But he is among those who question whether
planes actually crashed into the Pentagon or in Pennsylvania and
suggests that the crashes might have been staged to whip up popular
outrage. He implies that the alleged hijackers who were on those
planes could still be alive.
At Mr. von
Bulow’s reading at Munich’s Literaturhaus,
not all those in the audience agreed with, or were familiar with,
his specific charges. He seemed to win favor with his more-general
claim that the U.S., once a model for postwar Europe, has become
an unreliable nation, from which Germans had best keep their distance. “Each
one of our countries has in the past tried to be the dominant world
power,” he said. “But I don’t want to be dragged
into another world war, one that will last for years and years.”
In conversations
with a dozen visitors, one woman said she found Mr. von Bulow’s theories bunk, while others said they found
them plausible. “I can’t believe all of it. That would
destroy my belief in humanity,” says Daniel Feifal, a student. “But
that they knew about the attacks and let them happen because it
could further their foreign-policy aims, yes, I’m prepared
to believe that.”
|